Autopen Scandal: Trump Officials Uncover Shocking Truth Behind Biden's Final Orders

📍 What You Need to Know

The Biden autopen saga has officially moved from speculation to full-blown investigation. The White House Counsel’s Office is now leading a deep-dive probe—coordinating with the Department of Justice—into former President Joe Biden’s use of the autopen, a machine designed to replicate handwritten signatures. The investigation centers on whether the device was used properly during Biden’s presidency, especially in his final months.

So far, the National Archives (NARA) has turned over more than 27,000 documents, with officials expecting to comb through upward of one million records. At stake is the legitimacy of over 1,500 pardons and clemency grants, including controversial preemptive pardons for Dr. Anthony Fauci, Gen. Mark Milley, and members of the January 6 committee. Notably, Biden personally signed only one pardon—for his son, Hunter—after pledging not to.

The investigation is also examining whether proper checks and balances were in place to ensure the autopen wasn’t being used without Biden’s explicit direction. Officials want to know if the machine signed based on his command—or if it ever acted as a surrogate for decisions he wasn’t making himself.

📉 Why This Matters

This is about more than just a mechanical pen. It's about who was really calling the shots. Was President Biden fully in control during his final year—or did unelected aides and staffers quietly step into the role of commander-in-chief by way of a pen-gripping robot?

Autopens are legal tools, but their use is expected to reflect the will of the president, not replace it. As scrutiny builds, critics are raising uncomfortable but critical questions: Was Biden too unwell or detached to review the sweeping actions taken in his name? And if so, was executive power misused—or misrepresented?

Biden insists he made every decision. But even The New York Times reported that he didn’t personally approve each individual name involved in broad categorical pardons. That admission gives weight to Congressional investigations already underway, including probes into Biden’s mental fitness and the transparency of his administration.

📈 What’s Next?

With more NARA documents on the way and attorneys from multiple departments involved, this probe is turning into one of the most extensive post-presidency audits in recent memory. And it’s not just internal—Congress is still pursuing its own lines of inquiry, especially through the House Oversight Committee.

White House officials have framed the investigation as a necessary move for public accountability. Former Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, speaking on behalf of the Trump camp, said it’s about finding out “how business in the Biden White House was really run.” Trump allies maintain that he never used the autopen for any official business and point to Biden’s situation as a breakdown of executive responsibility.

Whatever the outcome, this isn’t just about Biden’s legacy—it’s a defining test of how we interpret presidential authority in a modern, tech-assisted government.

🗣️ MainEvent.News | Editor’s Take

This story might sound like political drama—but it’s far more than that. It’s a test of truth, trust, and the presidency itself. If Biden knowingly signed off on every decision, the autopen is just a tool. But if staffers used it without full approval, or if he was unable to meaningfully review what was being signed, then we’re facing a quiet constitutional dilemma. The American people don’t elect a signature—they elect a leader. And in the age of AI, deepfakes, and political theater, the value of a real signature might matter more than ever.

Be sure to follow us on X @MainEventNews as big things are surely to be breaking over the next few days.